🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.