🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as one of the largest deceptions of its kind in the United Kingdom.

Altogether 14 people have been convicted for their part in a multi-million pound conspiracy to swindle more than 3,500 timeshare investors.

The victims were eager to get out of long-standing vacation property deals and went looking for support.

The majority were aged between 60 and 80. More than 500 of them lost in excess of £10,000, and one paid in excess of £80,000.

Those affected were subjected to intense presentations lasting up to six hours. They were left out of pocket, possessing worthless fake "points" and remained bound by costly holiday ownership agreements they frequently were unable to use.

The Business At the Heart of the Fraud

The firm at the core of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected clients' cash to fund the directors' lavish way of life of prestigious schooling, high-end properties and private jets.

The leader at the top of the firm, the main defendant, was sentenced to a seven-and-half year jail time in January for fraudulent conspiracy.

In the latest development, his partner Nicola was among the last group to learn their fate.

She received a two-year deferred imprisonment at the judicial venue after admitting money laundering.

It has been a long time coming and marks a huge win for the individuals who testified, the law enforcement and legal representatives.

How the Inquiry Was Initiated

The first knowledge of the company emerged during the summer of 2016. I was working in the reporting team of a news organization, creating current affairs programmes.

A acquaintance pointed out that his mum had assumed the ownership of a timeshare apartment in a European resort and, after decades of vacations, had begun looking to get out of the deal.

It is important to recall how common vacation properties had become with UK travelers in the 1980s and 1990s.

Timeshares enabled families to occupy the same accommodation every year, or trade their weeks with fellow investors who had units in different locations. Approximately 600,000 holiday enthusiasts took up that opportunity.

The first timeshare rush was paired with a numerous reports about dishonest operators mis-selling units. They were regularly featured on public interest TV programmes.

The typical timeshare contract locked buyers for decades.

At that time, those investors who had experienced their regular accommodation in the sunshine for 20 or 30 years were ageing, and a significant number were looking to say farewell to their holiday properties.

A number had health issues and were unable to visit their units. A few just felt they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had passed away, in many cases leaving their family members to take over the agreements - along with their yearly fees and upkeep costs.

The Investigation Progresses

And that's where the friend's mum had ended up. She looked online for options and found the organization, a business whose online presence assured to release her from her deal.

But, having submitted funds and scheduled a consultation with them, her family had doubts.

Subsequent checking showed hundreds of people claiming they had handed over cash and received no benefit from the service. Indeed, they had lost money. Substantial amounts.

The investigative unit began investigating what was occurring. It soon emerged that there were questionable operators operating in the timeshare resale sector.

One lawyer had hundreds of individual complaints waiting to sue the organization.

The team interviewed clients who had engaged the company and they all told the same story. They thought the firm would purchase their timeshare off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they paid up front) they were informed there was no market for their property.

In place of that, they were encouraged - in fact pressured - to spend more money purchasing "the company's points system", named after the organization's holding firm, the overarching entity.

The precise definition was not exactly clear. They seemed similar to a type of exchange medium, giving access to discount travel and benefits and shopping deals.

And they were reportedly "transferable with other owners, eventually.

Paying cash up front now would result in an long-term benefit that would cover the firm's costs and result in the timeshare holder in profit, liberated eventually from their troublesome deal.

An unbelievable offer? Well, yes.

A 'Misleading Scheme'

If these accounts were accurate, this was a major deception.

This is known as a "bait-and-switch."

An operator - specifically SMT - "baits" the customer by marketing a specific service but then to claim it is unavailable, steering the customer towards a different, lower-quality offering.

This is against the law. Armed with all the testimony we had gathered, we argued to secretly film one of the company's meetings.

This takes time, effort, and strong justifications for why this is the exclusive approach to gather the information needed to confirm deceptive practices.

Once authorized, our small team set up a appointment with one of the organization's staff in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Acting as a member of the public hoping to get his mum released from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement